Review Article

Seed Biopriming– A Review

Amol J. Deshmukh, R. S. Jaiman, R. P. Bambharolia and Vijay A. Patil

  • Page No:  038 - 043
  • Published online: 23 Feb 2020
  • DOI: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.23910/2/2020.0359

  • Abstract

There are various seed priming methods such as hydro priming, osmo priming, solid matrix priming, hormo-priming, chemo-priming, nutri-priming and biopriming being useful for enhancing the seed germination, seedling vigour and to overcome abiotic stress. Moreover to these advantages, of all priming methods only biopriming method gives an extra advantage of biotic stress management and thus gain special attention. Solubilisation or mobilization of soil macro and micronutrients, siderophore production, induction of plant growth promoting activities, induction of useful biochemicals, phytoalexin and defense-related enzymes and induced systemic resistance are the mechanisms involved in seed biopriming. Range of fungal or bacterial bio agents viz., Azotobacter, Rhizobium, Arthrobacter, Agrobacterium, Azospirillum, Enterobacter, Streptomyces, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Klebsiella, PSB, Pseudomonas fluorescence, Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma harzianum and Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorhiza, whether they are biofertilizer or biopesticide, may be useful as biopriming agents. Seed biopriming is useful in almost all the crops over the globe and is an eco-friendly substitute to chemical fungicides.

Keywords :   Biopriming, bioagent, PGPR, seed 

  • Introduction

    Bio-priming is an innovative skill of seed treatment that assimilates biological (inoculation of seed with beneficial organism to protect seed) and physiological facets (seed hydration) of disease control (Reddy, 2012). It is recently used as an alternate method for controlling many seed and soil-borne pathogens. Biopriming of seeds denotes standard tactic for introduction of disease resistance via bio control agents. Priming of seeds with helpful microorganisms and bio control means has been testified more proficiently for the management of diseases and pests as equated to other available methodologies (Prabha et al., 2019). The seed biopriming is a recently adapted method of seed priming. Seed priming is a pre-sowing treatment which leads to a physiological state that allows seed to germinate more proficiently. The preponderance of seed treatments are based on seed imbibition allowing the seeds to go through the first reversible stage of germination but does not allow radical protrusion through the seed coat. Seeds keeping their desiccation tolerance are then dehydrated and can be stored until final sowing (Stanley et al., 2016). Even though there are diverse types of seed priming approaches being adopted in the crops biopriming is having its own importance and thus tried to summarize the review of literature on the seed biopriming here.

  • Different Types of Seed Priming

    There are numbers of priming approaches being expedient in numbers of horticultural and forest tree crops. First one is hydro priming which relies on seed soaking in pure water and re-drying to original moisture content prior to sowing. No use of additional chemical substances as a priming agent makes this method a cheap and eco-friendly (Taylor et al., 1998). The second one is osmopriming which involves soaking seeds in salty solution with low water potential instead of pure water. Due to low water potential of salty solutions, water enters seed slowly which allows steady seed imbibition and activation of early phases of germination but restricts radicle protrusion (Di Girolamo and Barbanti, 2012). Third one is solid matrix priming which involves mixing and incubation of seeds with wet solid water carrier for a certain period. Subsequently, seeds are detached from matrix, washed and back-dried. The use of solid medium permits seeds to hydrate gradually and stimulates natural imbibition process arising in the soil (McDonald, 2000). Fourth one is hormopriming in which seeds imbibition arises in the presence of plant growth regulators, which can have direct influence on seed metabolic processes. The growth regulators frequently used in hormopriming are: abscisic acid, auxins, gibberellins, kinetin, ethylene, polyamines and salicylic acid (SA). Gibberellic acid (GA3) and PEG priming improved photosynthetic properties, antioxidant system, seedling emergence and growth of white clover on heavy metal polluted soil (Galhaut et al., 2014). Fifth one is chemo-priming which denotes to seed treatment with different chemical solutions used as priming agents. This practice includes priming with extensive range of both natural and synthetic compounds such as antioxidants (ascorbic acid, glutathione, tocopherol, melatonin and proline), hydrogen peroxide, sodium nitroprusside, urea, thiourea, mannose, selenium, chitosan, fungicide etc. Positive effects of chemo-priming with various priming agents in a wide range of environmental conditions were directed by various studies (Patade et al., 2012). Sixth one is Nutri-priming in which seeds are soaked with solutions containing the limiting nutrient instead of pure water. The inkling of this technique is to acquire nutritional influence composed with biochemical benefits of priming in order to increase seed quality, germination parameters and seedling establishment (Farooq et al., 2012). Seventh and last one is biopriming which involves seed imbibition together with bio control agent or PGPR inoculation of seed (Callan et al., 1990).

  • Merits of Bio-priming Over Other Seed Priming Methods

    As other priming method, bio-priming also intensifies rate and homogeneity of seed germination, but also protects seeds against the soil and seed-borne pathogens. Hydration of seeds infected with pathogens during priming can result in a stronger microbial growth and subsequently weakening of plant vigour. However, applying antagonistic microorganisms during priming is an eco-friendly procedure to overwhelm the disease problem (Reddy, 2013). Moreover, some bacteria used as bio control agents are able to inhabit in rhizosphere and upkeep plant in both direct and indirect way after germination stage (Callan et al., 1997). It was observed that seed biopriming is a highly effective tactic of disease management than other practices such as pelleting and film coating (Muller and Berg, 2008). Now a days, the use of biopriming with plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as an integral component of agronomic practice shows great potential (Timmusk et al., 2014). Hydro priming, osmo-priming, hormo-primng, solid matrix priming, chemo-priming and nutri-priming are the priming approaches those were mostly found appropriate to reduce abiotic stress but the biopriming was not only found appropriate to fight abiotic stress but also to fight biotic stress (Stanley et al., 2016). Bio primed seeds have an advantage over nonprimed seeds at the initial germination phase because bio-primed seeds have huge carbohydrate storage reserves which fortify the plant to stay alive from low oxygen stress under waterlogged situations (Ella et al., 2011). Seed biopriming is also a best substitute to chemical fungicides and is eco-friendly too. Thus, biopriming is now days considered as a very good biological weapon which would be useful in Agriculture.

  • Mechanisms Involved in Seed Biopriming

    Bio-priming is directly involved in the enrichment of plant development by the excretion of compounds and mineral solubilisation (Sukanya et al., 2018). Phosphorus solubilising microorganism like Bacillus, Beijerinckia, Enterobacter, Microbacterium, Pseudomonas and Serratia release rock crystal dissolving compounds like organic anions, protons, hydroxyl ions, carbon dioxide or liberation of extracellular enzymes namely phosphatase leads to solubilisation of the phosphorus and make it obtainable to plant (Zaidi et al., 2009; Glick, 2012). Some PGPR used in bio-priming have the capacity to mobilize potassium from potassium-bearing minerals (Mica, illite and Orthoclase) by emission of organic acids (citric acid, tartaric acid and oxalic acid) which directly dissolves the rock potassium or chelate the silicon ion (Sheng and He, 2006). Siderophore production by bio control agents in primed seeds has inhibited the disease and improved the plant growth (Keswani et al., 2014; Jain et al., 2012). Bio-priming with PGPR in various crops having the capacity to produce growth hormones such as auxin, cytokinin, gibberellin etc. which recorded high germination rate, higher shoot and root growth and homogenous crop stands (Glick, 2012; Noel et al., 1996; Verma et al., 2001). Bio-priming is the best solution for better growth and expansion of micro-propagated plants which have abridged photosynthetic activity, poorly working stomata and undersized root and shoot system (Kavino et al., 2010). Bio-priming with PGPR reducing the period required for lignification of micro-propagated plants and accelerates production process (Ramamoorthy et al., 2002). Bio-priming leads to biochemical changes viz., enhanced production of proteins, hormones, phenol and flavonoid compounds contribute to enhanced plant growth and improved performance. Growth responses in herbaceous plants are calculated by nitrogen reserve compounds like nitrates, amino acids and proteins (Volenec et al., 1996). Soluble protein fractions in bio-primed seeds and seedlings were found higher as compared to non-primed seeds (Dhanya, 2014). There was increase in total protein content and free amino acid content during the diverse growth stages after seed bio-priming with PGPR (Aishwath et al., 2012; Warwate, 2017, Ahmed et al., 2014). PGPR used in bio-priming enriched the production of particular phenolic substances in plants at diverse growth phases (Singh et al., 2003). Moreover to plant growth preferment, seed bio-priming also encourages the production of defense-related enzymes (peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, catalase, chitinase, ammonia lyases, etc.) which deals with the plant fitness benefit against biotic and abiotic stress. The respiration, energy metabolism and early reserve mobilization events in crops were controlled by bio-priming (Chen et al., 2013; Paparella et al., 2015). Seed biopriming with bio control agents was also found useful in the development of induced systemic resistance in plants. Biocontrol agents, particularly rhizobacteria, have been shown to be effective in defeating disease infection by encouraging a resistance mechanism called “induced systemic resistance” (ISR) in varied crops (Van Loon et al. 1998). Induced resistance is defined as encouragement of plants with enhanced defensive ability of plants against different plant pathogens. Van Peer et al. (1991) found that inoculation of Pseudomonas fluorescens in carnation stem lead to low infection of Fusarium wilt. This low level of Fusarium wilt was endorsed due to induced resistance and deposition of phytoalexins in the carnation stem. Similarly, Wei et al. (1991) confirmed that seed treated with PGPR strains in cucumber resulted in declining of anthracnose disease and further concluded that the application of PGPR strains to seeds activated induced systemic resistance which leads to protect the leaves of cucumber plants against anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum orbiculare.

  • Fungal Bioagents Used in Seed Bio-priming

    Extensive kind of fungal bio control agents through its innovative interactions with plant has made them helpful for combating biotic and abiotic stresses. Trichoderma harzianum is most commonly used bio-priming fungi for its infinite range of antagonism against plant pathogens, mainly fungi and nematodes (Singh et al. 2004); enlarged plant growth especially roots particularly under stress (Shoresh et al. 2010); systemic resistance to abiotic plant stresses including drought, salt and temperature (Mansouri et al. 2010 ; Shoresh et al. 2010); decomposition of organic matter thereby increasing humic acid in soil; solubilisation and mobilisation of phosphorus and enhanced nitrogen use efficiency and nutrient availability (Singh et al. 2004). Symbiotic fungi, Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza (VAM), viz. Acaulospora sp., Ambispora sp., Gigaspora sp., Glomus sp., Pacispora sp. and Paraglomus sp., have revealed significant influence on plant nutrient uptake, growth and colossal capacity to resist abiotic stresses, especially in drought situations; however, the success of establishing symbiotic interaction was limited through bio-priming, but recent reports suggest that inclusion of some biostimulants has made it successful by increasing the occurrence of viable colonies and percent infection at early seedling growth stages. Seeds of tomato treated with T. harzianum Rifai strain T-22 alleviated abiotic stress factors like osmosis, salinity, chilling and high temperature (Mansouri et al. 2010).

  • Bacterial Bioagents Used in Seed Bio-priming

    Bacteria are the most ample soil microbes and having vital part in nutrient cycling for preserving the soil fertility. Helpful bacteria in rhizosphere are of two types: (a) bacteria forming symbiotic association through particular assemblies and (b) free-living bacteria present in the neighbourhood of plant province which are mainly known as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). PGPR include a extensive variety of bacteria belonging to genera Azotobacter, Arthrobacter, Agrobacterium, Azospirillum, Enterobacter, Streptomyces, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Serratia (Gray and Smith, 2005; Vessey, 2003). Application of PGPR to seed through seed bio-priming enhances plant performance under stress environments and consequently enhances plant yield both directly and indirectly (Dimkpa et al., 2009). Some PGPR may induce direct stimulation of plant growth and its improvement by providing them with some common nutrients and phytohormones that have been impounded by bacterial siderophores (Hayat et al., 2010; Rodriguez and Fraga, 1999). Strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum pv. Viciae deliberate tolerance to abiotic stress factors like drought and salinity by preserving its capability to nodulate and fix nitrogen in faba bean (Belal et al., 2013). Inoculation of PGPR via seed biopriming shows synergistic effects, where one acts as a helper for enhanced performance of other inoculant. In the rhizosphere, the synergism between various bacterial genera such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Rhizobium are well demonstrated to promote plant growth and development. Compared to single inoculation, co-inoculation improved the absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and other mineral nutrients by seed crop (Figueiredo et al., 2011; Yadegari et al., 2010).

  • Application of Seed Bio-priming in Various Crops

    Khan (1992) showed that seed priming comprehended a range of physiological treatments that boosted seed germination and seedling vigour through the addition of moisture. The addition of microbial biocontrol agents during biopriming allowed bioagents for colonization of the seeds prior to planting and added a new dimension to seed priming treatment. Malathi and Doraisamy (2004) found that seed priming with Trichoderma protected seeds of groundnut from the infection of M. phaseolina with improved seedling vigour, dry matter production and prevented loss of oil content up to six months of storage. Mohamedy et al. (2006) found that biopriming of pea seeds with T. harzianum showed significant decrease in pre-emergence damping off caused by F. solani, R. solani and M. phaseolina which was at par with soil treatment of bagasse + T. harzianum (10% w/w). It also resulted significantly more fresh pod yield and quality as compared to the chemical seed treatment. Sarkar and Bhattacharya (2008) found that the mung bean seeds soaked in suspension of P. fluorescens or T. harzianum not only reduced the root rot incidence in pot trial but also increased root length, shoot length, dry weight of seedling (45 DAP) and yield as compared to control in field trial. Mohamedy and Baky (2008) found that biopriming of pea seeds with B. subtilis and T. harzianum showed the highest survival and lowest root rot disease incidence. It also showed highest plant height, more numbers of leaves and branches/plant, dry weight of shoots/plant, pod length and diameter, numbers of seed/pod, highest percentage of green pod, seed to pod weight, TSS, highest carbohydrate and protein. Nayaka et al. (2008) emphasized that the biopriming with T.harzianum was more effective in controlling the Fusarium verticillioides incidence of maize. The result further indicated an increase of seed germination, vigour index, field emergence, yield, and test weight in comparison with the control. Biopriming with P. aeruginosa was the most effective treatment for controlling pre and post-emergence damping-off of soybean caused by C. truncatum. It also enhanced germination of seed and healthy seedling stand (Begum et al., 2009). Sharma et al. (2009) showed that biopriming of cumin seeds with T. harzianum increased the germination of seeds while biopriming with T. viride showed good shoot-root ratio in pot condition. Someshwar and Sitansu (2010) used bacterial inoculum of P.fluorescens for seed biopriming and they found better performance in stimulating the germination of seeds of chilli, tomato and brinjal over some fungal biopriming agents viz, T. viride AN-10 and T. harzianum AN-13 while it was equivalent to T. harzianum WB-1 in inducing germination of the crop seeds. The highest germination of seed was obtained when crop seeds wereprimed with mycelial form of inoculum of T. harzianum AN-5 and WB-1. Minaxi and Saxena (2010a) recommended bacterization of seeds of moong bean with P. fluorescens BAM-4 as a potential method for enhancing plant growth, yield and for providing protection against M. phaseolina. It also showed a significant increase in seed germination, shoot length, shoot fresh and dry weight, root length, root fresh and dry weight, leaf area and rhizosphere colonization. Yield parameters such as pods, numbers of seeds, and grain yield per plant also enhanced significantly in comparison to the control. Moreover, the production of siderophore (a source providing iron) and chitinase (a source providing protection against pathogenic fungi) by P.fluorescens BAM-4 was also observed in vitro. Further, Minaxi and Saxena (2010b) reported bacterization of seeds of moong bean with P. aeruginosa RM-3 as a potential method for enhancing plant growth, yield and for providing protection against diseases caused by M. phaseolina. It also showed a significant increase in seed germination, shoot length, shoot fresh and dry weight, root length, root fresh and dry weight, leaf area and rhizosphere colonization. Yield parameters such as pods, number of seeds, and grain yield per plant also enhanced significantly in comparison to control both in vitro and in field condition.

  • Conclusion

    Seed bio-priming is one of the innovative priming method over all the other priming methods as it is being useful not only for enhancing the seed germination, seedling vigour and to overcome abiotic stress but also useful for the management of biotic stress. Range of fungal or bacterial bio agents whether they are biofertilizer or biopesticide may be useful as biopriming agents. Seed bio-priming is useful in almost all types of cereal, pulse, vegetable, horticultural and forest crops.


  • Ahmed, R.S., Mohamed, S.A., Abd, M.A., Khalid, A., 2014. Potential impacts of seed bacterization or salix extract in faba bean for enhancing protection against bean yellow mosaic disease. Nature and Science 12, 213−215.

    Aishwath, O.P., Lal, G., Kant, K., Sharma, Y.K., Ali, S.F., Naimuddin, 2012. Influence of biofertilizers on growth and yield of coriander under typic haplustepts. International Journal of Seed Spices 2, 9−14.

    Begum, M.M., Sariaha, M., Putehb, A.B., Zainal Abidina, M.A., Rahmanb, M.A., Siddiquia, Y., 2009.

    Belal, E.B., Hassan, M.M., El-Ramady, H.R., 2013. Phylogenetic and characterization of salt-tolerant rhizobial strain nodulatingfaba bean plants. African Journal of Biotechnology12,4324–4337.

    Callan, N.W., Marthre, D.E., Miller, J.B., 1990. Bio-priming seed treatment for biological control of Pythium ultimum pre emergence damping-off in sh-2 sweet corn. Plant Disease 74, 368−372.

    Callan, N.W., Mathre, D.E., Miller, J.B., Vavrina, C.S., 1997. Biological seed treatments: factors involved in efficacy. Horticultural Science 32, 179−183.

    Chen, K., Arora, R., Priming memory invokes seed stress-tolerance. 2013. Environmental Experimental Botany94,33–45.

    Dhanya, B.A., 2014. Evaluation of microbial seed priming in relation to seed germination, plant growth promotion in Morinda citrifolia L. (Noni). M. Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.

    Di Girolamo, G., Barbanti, L., 2012. Treatment conditions and biochemical processes influencing seed priming effectiveness. Italian Journal of Agronomy 7, 8−18.

    Dimkpa, C., Weinand, T., Asch, F., 2009. Plant–rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environment 32, 1682–1694.

    Ella, E.S., Dionisio-Sese, M.L., Ismail, A.M., 2011. Seed pre-treatment in rice reduces damage, enhances carbohydrate mobilization and improves emergence and seedling establishment under flooded conditions. AoB Plants: plr00.doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plr007.

    Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Siddique, K.H.M., 2012. Micronutrients application through seed treatments – a review. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 12, 125−142.

    Figueiredo, M.V.B., Seldin, L., de Araujo, F.F., Mariano, R.D.L.R., 2011. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: fundamentals and applications. In: Plant growth and health promoting bacteria, 21–43.

    Galhaut, L., Lespinay, A., Walker, D.J., Bernal, M.P., Correal, E., Lutts, S., 2014. Seed priming of Trifolium repens L. improved germination and early seedling growth on heavy metal-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollution 225, 1−15.

    Glick, B.R., 2012. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Scientifica, 1−15.

    Gray, E.J., Smith, D.L., 2005. Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant bacterium signalling processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37, 395–412.

    Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., Ahmed, I., 2010. Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review. Annals of Microbiology60, 579–598.

    Jain, A., Singh, S., Sarma, K.B., Singh, H.B. 2012. Microbial consortium mediated reprogramming of defence network in pea to enhance tolerance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Journal of Applied Microbiology 112, 537−550.

    Kavino, M., Harish, S., Kumar, N., Saravanakumar, D., Samiyappan, R., 2010. Effect of chitinolytic PGPR on growth, yield and physiological attributes of banana (Musa spp.) under field conditions. Applied Soil Ecology 45, 71−77.

    Keswani, C., Mishra, S., Sarma, B.K., Singh, S.P., Singh, H., 2014. Unraveling the efficient application of secondary metabolites of various Trichoderma. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 98, 533−544.

    Khan, A.A., 1992. Pre plant physiological seed conditioning. Horticultural Reviews 13, 301−307.

    Malathi, P., Doraisamy, S., 2004. Effect of seed priming with Trichoderma on seed borne infection of Macrophomina phaseolina and seed quality in groundnut. Annals-of-Plant-Protection-Sciences 12,87−91.

    Mansouri, F., Bjorkman, T., Harman, G.E., 2010. Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic and physiological stress in germinating seed and seedling. Phytopathology 100, 1213–1221.

    McDonald, M.B., 2000. Seed priming. In: Black, M., Bewley, J.D. (eds). Seed Technology and its Biological Basis. Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press, 287−325.

    Minaxi, Saxena, J., 2010a. Disease suppression and crop improvement in moong beans (Vigna radiata) through Pseudomonas and Burkholderia strains isolated from semi arid region of Rajasthan, India. Biocontrol 55, 799−810.

    Minaxi, Saxena, J., 2010b. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RM-3 as a potential Biocontrol agent. Mycopathologia 170, 181−193.

    Mohamedy, E.I.R.S.R., Abd Alla, M.A., Badiaa, R.I., 2006. Soil amendment and seed bio-priming treatments as alternative fungicides for controlling root rot diseases on cowpea plants in nobaria province. Research Journal of Agriculture and BiologicalSciences 2, 391−398.

    Mohamedy, E.I.R.S.R., Baky, A.E.l.M.M.H., 2008. Evaluation of different types of seed treatment on control of root rot disease, improvement growth and yield quality of pea plant in nobaria province. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 4, 611−622.

    Muller, H., Berg, G., 2008. Impact of formulation procedures on the effect of the biocontrol agent Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48 on Verticillium wilt in oilseed rape. BioControl 53, 305−316.

    Nayaka, S.R., Niranjana, A.C., Uday Shankar, S., Niranjanraj, M.S., Reddy, H.S., Prakash, C.N., Mortensen, 2008. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection43, 264–282.

    Noel, T.C., Sheng, C., Yost, C.K., Pharis, R.P., Hynes, M.F., 1996. Rhizobium leguminosarum as a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium: direct growth promotion of canola and lettuce. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 42, 279–283.

    Paparella, S., Arau, J.S.S., Rossi, G., Wijayasinghe, M., Carbonera, D., Balestrazzi, A., 2015. Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Reproduction34, 1281–1293.

    Patade, V.Y, Khatri, D., Manoj, K., Kumari, M., Ahmed, Z., 2012. Cold tolerance in thiourea primed capsicum seedlings is associated with transcript regulation of stress responsive genes. Molecular Biology Reports 39, 10603-10613.

    Prabha, R., Singh, D.P., Yadav, S.K., 2019. Seed biopriming with potential microbial inoculants as sustainable options for stress management in crops. In: Singh, D., Prabha, R. (eds). Microbial Interventions in Agriculture and Environment. Springer, Singapore.

    Ramamoorthy, V., Raguchander, T., Samiyappan, R. 2002. Induction of defense related proteins in tomato roots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Plant-soil 239, 55−68.

    Reddy, P.P., 2012. Bio-priming of seeds. In: Recent advances in crop protection. Springer, New Delhi.

    Reddy, P.P., 2013. Bio-priming of seeds. In: Reddy, P.P. (Ed.), Recent Advances in Crop Protection. India, Springer, 83−90.

    Rodrìguez, H., Fraga, R., 1999. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology Advances17, 319–339.

    Sarkar, M., Bhattacharyya, P.K., 2008. Biological control of root rot of greengram caused by M. phaseolina by antagonistic microorganisms. Journal of Mycopathological Research46, 233−237.

    Sharma, Y.K., Anwer, M.M., Lodha, S.K., Sriram, S., Ramanujan, B., 2009. Microbial wealth and Plant health, 120−121.

    Sheng, X.F., He, L.Y., 2006. Solubilization of potassium-bearing minerals by a wildtype strain of Bacillus edaphicus and its mutants and increased potassium uptake by wheat. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 52, 66−72.

    Shoresh, M., Harman, G.E., Mastouri, F., 2010. Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology48, 21–43.

    Singh, U.S., Zaidi, N.W., Joshi, D., Jones, D., Khan, T., Bajpai, A., 2004. Trichoderma:a microbe with multifaceted activity. Annual Review of Plant Pathology3, 33–75.

    Singh, U.P., Sarma, B.K., Singh, D.P., 2003. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and culture filtrate of Sclerotium rolfsii on phenolic and salicylic acid contents in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Current Microbiology 46, 131−140.

    Someshwar, B., Sitansu, P., 2010. Biopriming of seeds for improving germination behavior of chilli, tomato and brinjal. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology40,375−379.

    Stanley, Lutts, Paolo, Benincasa, Lukasz, Wojtyla, Szymon Kubala, S., Roberta Pace, Katzarina Lechowska, Muriel, Quinet, Malgorzata Garnczarska, 2016. Seed Priming: New comprehensive approaches for an old empirical technique. In:

    Sukanya, V., Patel, R.M., Suthar, K.P., Singh, D., 2018. An Overview: Mechanism Involved in Bio-Priming Mediated Plant Growth Promotion. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience6, 771−783.

    Taylor, A.G., Allen, P.S., Bennett, M.A., Bradford, J.K., Burris, J.S., Mishra, M.K., 1998. Seed enhancements. Seed Science Research 8, 245−256.

    Timmusk, S., Abd El-Daim, I.A., Copolovici, L., Tanilas, T., Kannaste, A., Behers, L., Nevo, E., Seisenbaeva, G., Stenstrom, E,, Niinemets, U., 2014. Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PLoS One 9, e96086.

    Van Loon, L.C., Bakker, P.A.H.M., Pieterse, C.M.J., 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology36, 453–483.

    Van Peer, R., Niemann, G.J., Schippers, B., 1991. Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. Strain WCS417r. Phytopathology 91, 728–734.

    Verma, A., Kukreja, K., Pathak, D.V., Suneja, S., Narula, N., 2001. In vitro production of plant growth regulators (PGRs) by Azorobacter chroococcum. Indian Journal of Microbiology 41, 305–307.

    Vessey, J.K., 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil255, 571–586.

    Volenec, J.J., Ourry, A., Joern, B.C., 1996. A role for nitrogen reserves in forage regrowth and stress tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum 97, 185−193.

    Warwate, S.I., Kandoliya, U.K., Bhadja, N.V., Golakiya, B.A., 2017. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on biochemical parameters of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) seedling. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6, 1935−1944.

    Wei, G., Kloepper, J.W., Tuzun, S., 1991. Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology8, 1508–1512.

    Yadegari, M., Rahmani, H.A., Noormohammadi, G., Ayneband, A., 2010. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria increase growth, yield and nitrogen fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Plant Nutrition33,1733–1743.

    Zaidi, A., Khan, M.S., Ahemad, M., Oves, M., 2009. Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica 56, 263–284.


Deshmukh AJ, Jaiman RS, Bambharolia RP, Patil VA. Seed Biopriming– A Review IJEP [Internet]. 23Feb.2020[cited 8Feb.2022];7(1):038-043. Available from:

People also read

Review Article

Melia dubia and its Importance: A Review

Manika Goswami, Shikha Bhagta and Dushyant Sharma

Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antifeedent, Melia dubia, timber

Published Online : 18 Feb 2020

Short Research

Impact of Kisan Credit Card Scheme on Agriculture Production: A Case Study of Kathua District

Neetu Andotra and Pooja Gupta

Kisan credit card, agriculture production, KCC beneficiaries

Published Online : 28 May 2015