Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
Table 1: Code, pedigrees and origin of genotypes evaluated in this study
Table 2: Parametric, non-parametric stability index and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for the triticale genotypes used in the study
Figure 1: The relationship between the regression coefficients and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 2: The relationship between the Wricke’s ecovalence stability index (Wi²) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 3: The relationship between the environmental coefficient of variance (CVi) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 4: The relationship between the Nassar and Huhn’s non-parametric index (Si(3)) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Figure 5: The relationship between the Thennarasu’s non-parametric index (NP4) and mean grain yield (kg ha-1) for triticale genotypes tested
Table 3: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients among parametric and non parametric stability indices used in this study
Figure 6: Biplot of IPC1 (F1) and IPC2 (F2) of the rank correlation matrix of the stability parameters with grain yield and triticale genotypes tested
People also read
Full Research
Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Productivity of Rapeseed-mustard Cultivars
P. K. Saha, G. C. Malik, P. Bhattacharyya and M. BanerjeeNutrient management, variety, rapeseed-mustard, seed yield
Published Online : 07 Apr 2015
Review Article
Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Response to Low Temperature Stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): A Review
D. K. Yadav, Yogendra K. Meena, L. N. Bairwa, Uadal Singh, S. K. Bairwa1, M. R. Choudhary and A. SinghAntioxidant enzymes, morphological, osmoprotectan, physiological, ROS, tomato
Published Online : 31 Dec 2021
Research Article
Constraints Perceived by the Farmers in Adoption of Improved Ginger Production Technology- a Study of Low Hills of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjeev Kumar, S. P. Singh and Raj Rani SharmaConstraints, ginger, mean percent score, schedule
Published Online : 27 Dec 2018
Research Article
Social Structure of Mizo Village: a Participatory Rural Appraisal
Lalhmunmawia and Samares Kumar DasSocial structure, Mizoram, Mizo village, PRA
Published Online : 05 Mar 2018
Research Article
Traditional Knowledge on Uncultivated Green Leafy Vegetables (UCGLVS) Used in Nalgonda District of Telangana
Kanneboina Soujanya, B. Anila Kumari, E. Jyothsna and V. Kavitha KiranNutritious, traditional knowledge, uncultivated green leafy vegetable
Published Online : 30 Jul 2021
Research Article
Use of Aloe Vera Gel Coating as Preservative on Tomato
Ambuza Roy and Anindita KarmakarAloe vera, edible coating, shelf life, preservative, tomatoes
Published Online : 11 Oct 2019