Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
People also read
Research Article
Identification of Rich Oil-Protein and Disease Resistance Genotypes in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]
Shivani Uikey, Stuti Sharma, Pawan K. Amrate and M. K. ShrivastavaAerial blight, frog eye leaf spot, oil-protein, resistance, soybean
Published Online : 31 May 2022
Geographical Distribution
The Aetiology of the Formation and Condensation of the Present Day Sand Hills
Mohammad Reza Asghari MoghadamPebbles, sand hills, temperature, pressure, playas, kavir, Iran
Published Online : 07 Jun 2011
Incidence of Aphid and Whitefly on Different Planting Dates in Relation to Abiotic Factors in Potato Variety Kufri jyoti
Lanunochetla, M. Alemla Ao and Pankaj NeogKufri Jyoti, potato, aphid, whitefly, correlation
Published Online : 07 Jun 2012
Research Article
Identification of Drought Tolerant Recombinant Inbred Lines and Estimation of Genetic Diversity by Clustering and Multivariate Analysis in Wheat RILs Populations
Vikrant Khare, R. S. Shukla, Suneeta Pandey and Sanjay SinghCluster analysis, PCA, selection indices and grain yield
Published Online : 31 May 2022
The First International Conference on Bio-resource and Stress Management: A Review
Samares Das, A. V. Ramanjaneyulu and N. C. SarkarPublished Online : 07 Mar 2013
Full Research
Genetic Variability in Immunocompetence and Performance Status of Rhode Island Red Chicken Strains and its Crosses
Ananta Kumar Das, Sanjeev Kumar, Abdul Rahim and Anil Kumar MishraGenetic variability, Immunocompetence, Production traits, RIR, CARI-Sonali, CARI-Debendra
Published Online : 07 Jun 2014
.jpg)
.jpg)
