Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
Figure 1: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with TMB0409 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 2: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with DPL0094 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2 : L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 1: Amplification and analysis details of SSR primers
Figure 3: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with BNL686 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777×L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777×G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 4: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with JESPR153 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 5: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with CM45 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Figure 6: Amplification patterns of different cotton hybrids and their parents with MGHES06 marker M: ladder (100–1000 bp), T1: G. Cot 16, T2: GSHV 185, S1: L 1384, S2: TCH 1777, T1T2: G. Cot 16×GSHV 185, T2T1: GSHV 185×G. Cot 16, T2S1: GSHV 185×L 1384, S1T2: L 1384×GSHV 185, S1S2: L 1384×TCH 1777, S2S1: TCH 1777× L 1384, T2S2: GSHV 185×TCH 1777, S2T2: TCH 1777×GSHV 185, S2T1: TCH 1777× G. Cot 16, T1S2: G. Cot 16×TCH 1777, T1S1: G. Cot 16×L 1384, S1T1: L 1384×G. Cot 16
Table 2: Jaccard’s similarity coefficient among different cotton parents and their hybrids based on molecular analysis
Figure 7: Dendrogram depicting the genetic relationship among the different cotton hybrids and their parents based on molecular analysis
Figure 8: Principle component analysis based on the molecular marker (Unit variance scaling is applied to rows; SVD with imputation is used to calculate principal components. X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explains 34.9% and 26.3% of the total variance, respectively. N = 12 data points.)
Figure 9: Heatmap analysis of molecular marker and genotypes (Heatmap shows unit variance scaling is applied to rows. Both rows and columns are clustered using correlation distance and average linkage)
People also read
Research Article
Problem and Constraints Faced by Rural Scheduled Caste Women for Entrepreneurship
Divya Sachan and Nishi SethiEntrepreneurship, woman, economy, economic development, problem and constraints.
Published Online : 03 Jul 2019
Research Article
Agro-economic Feasibility and Indices of Castor+Groundnut Intercropping System Under Irrigated Conditions During Rabi Season in Telangana
A. V. Ramanjaneyulu, K. Indudhar Reddy, M. V. Nagesh Kumar, A. Madhavi, M. Venkata Ramana, A. Srinivas and G. SureshATER, castor, groundnut, intercropping, LER, MAI, WUE
Published Online : 31 Mar 2021
Review Article
Astrologically Designed Medicinal Gardens of India
Maneesha S. R., P. Vidula, V. A. Ubarhande and E. B. ChakurkarVedic astrology, astral garden, celestial garden, zodiac garden
Published Online : 14 Apr 2021
Short Research
Morpho-genetic Characterization of Traditional Aromatic Tulaipanji Rice of North Bengal, India
Mrityunjay Ghosh, G. Mondal, B. Das and T. K. GhoseAromatic rice, grain quality, morpho-agronomic traits, SSR polymorphism
Published Online : 07 Jun 2018
Research Article
Social Structure of Mizo Village: a Participatory Rural Appraisal
Lalhmunmawia and Samares Kumar DasSocial structure, Mizoram, Mizo village, PRA
Published Online : 05 Mar 2018
Research Article
Impact of Weather Parameters on Population Fluctuation of Chilli Thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood
Laltu Mandal and Palash MondalChilli, correlation, regression, Scirtothrips dorsalis, thrips, trend analysis
Published Online : 15 Feb 2023
.jpg)
.jpg)
