Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 1: Strategy to generate Ulva lactuca extracts
Table 1: Yields in aqueous and organic extracts of Ulva lactuca
Figure 2: Pigment contents (mg g-1 DM) of the studied seaweeds Ulva lactuca
Table 2: Monosaccharide and disaccharide compositions of Ulva lactuca aqueous extracts (HPLC analysis)
Table 3: Antifungal activities around the wells of Ulva lactuca extracts and fractions in relation to inhibition zone diameter (mm)
Figure 3: Organic acids and anions contents (%) in the aqueous extracts of Ulva lactuca. For each compound, means with different letters (a-b-c-d) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
Figure 4: Inhibition percentages of spore germination (A) for Lebanese (Leb) and Chinese (Ch) Ulva lactuca (Ul.) Food powder (PFo), Feed powder (PFe), aqueous extracts (Aq.exts), Acetonic extracts (Ac. exts), Ethanolic extracts (Eth. Exts) and Ethyl acetate extracts (Ethyl ac. exts.): Inhibition percentage of colony-forming units (CFU) of fungal pathogens (B) on MEA medium incubated for four days with SLEs (B). Means with different letters (a-b-c-d-e-f) are significantly different (Duncan test at 0.5% probability level).
Figure 5: The adhesion index of P. digitatum to the orange epidermal cells in the presence of SLEs. Means with different letters are significantly different (Least significant difference LSD= 1.8, Duncan test at 0.5% probability level)
People also read
Review Article
Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Response to Low Temperature Stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): A Review
D. K. Yadav, Yogendra K. Meena, L. N. Bairwa, Uadal Singh, S. K. Bairwa1, M. R. Choudhary and A. SinghAntioxidant enzymes, morphological, osmoprotectan, physiological, ROS, tomato
Published Online : 31 Dec 2021
Research Article
Constraints Perceived by the Farmers in Adoption of Improved Ginger Production Technology- a Study of Low Hills of Himachal Pradesh
Sanjeev Kumar, S. P. Singh and Raj Rani SharmaConstraints, ginger, mean percent score, schedule
Published Online : 27 Dec 2018
Full Research
Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Productivity of Rapeseed-mustard Cultivars
P. K. Saha, G. C. Malik, P. Bhattacharyya and M. BanerjeeNutrient management, variety, rapeseed-mustard, seed yield
Published Online : 07 Apr 2015
Research Article
Use of Aloe Vera Gel Coating as Preservative on Tomato
Ambuza Roy and Anindita KarmakarAloe vera, edible coating, shelf life, preservative, tomatoes
Published Online : 11 Oct 2019
Research Article
Information Source Utilization Pattern of Pack Animal (Equine) Owners in Uttarakhand State of India
Tanusha and Rupasi TiwariInformation sources, Utilization pattern, Pack animal owners, Uttarakhand
Published Online : 19 Sep 2019
Review Article
An Overview of Indian Dacine Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae: Dacini)
A. Vasudha, Md. Abbas Ahmad and M. L. AgarwalDacini, phylogeny, distribution, host associations, male lures, bacterial associations
Published Online : 23 Oct 2019