Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
Table 1 : Univariate statistics and test of normality for days to heading, number of effective tillers-m and grain yield (g)-m from germplasm and national checks evaluated under rainfed condition in 2015–16
Table 2: Grouping of bread wheat genotypes based on integrating mean values and SD for studied trait
Table 3: Analysis of variance (Mean Squares), heritability, coefficient of variation, genetic advance and variances estimates for studied traits of bread wheat
Table 4: Standard errors and least significant differences
Table 5: Observed and Adjusted yield (g)-m of significant out yielder germplasm of bread wheat in rain fed trial
Table 6: Mean comparison of check cultivars
Table 7: Promising wheat germplasm for various traits identified in the germplasm pool
People also read
Animal Resource management
Anti-trypanosomal Potential of Methanolic Extract of Calotropis gigantea Leaves against Trypanosma evansi and its Cytotoxicity
P. Shaba, N. N. Pandey, O. P. Sharma, J. R. Rao and R. K. SinghCalotropis gigantea leaves, anti-trypanosomal activity, cytotoxicity test
Published Online : 07 Mar 2011
Changes in the Chemical Properties of a Soil Impacted by Intensive Agriculture, North-eastern Mexico
F. Silva-Arredondo, M. Pando Moreno*, H. Gonzalez Rodriguez and L. Scott MoralesAgrochemicals, potato cropping, Chihuahuan desert, Mexican plateau
Published Online : 07 Jun 2013
Effects of NPK Fertilizers, Household Waste Compost and Poultry Manure on Soil Fertility and Nutrient Uptake by Maize (Zea mays L.)
N. Hossain, M. G. Kibria and K.T. OsmanCompost, household waste, uptake, nutrient
Published Online : 07 Jun 2013
Full Research
Morphological and Molecular Variability of Rhizoctonia solani Isolates Causing Banded Leaf and Sheath Blight in Maize
M. Madhavi, P. Narayan Reddy, R. Ranga Reddy and S. Sokka ReddyRhizoctonia solani, morphological variability, PCA, genetic variability
Published Online : 07 Jun 2015
Effect of Tillage and Organic Manures on Soil Moisture and Performance of Rainfed Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.)
D. P. Sanepara, P. D. Vekariya, V. D. Vora, M. S. Gajera and K. N. AkbariDeep tillage, FYM, soil moisture, groundnut yield, economics
Published Online : 07 Aug 2015
Research Article
Effect of Different Coating Elements on Shelf Life of Indian Olive (Elaeocarpus floribundus Blume)
Sukanya Misra, Priyam Chattopadhayay, Prodyut kr. PaulIndian Olive, shelf life, coating element, Chitosan
Published Online : 07 Mar 2019
.jpg)
.jpg)
